He said, “The Central government is also keen that its decisions bind and bring society together, rather than cause any disruption in the religious and social psyche of one true India.” The Centre had stated in one affidavit that the studies conducted by the Geological Survey of India between December 20 also conclusively established that Adam’s Bridge was a natural geological formation comprising compact clay, calcareous sandstone and fossiliferous limestone. Krishnamani, appearing for petitioners Dandi Swami Sri Vidyananda Bharati and Ramagopalan, said the government must consider their suggestions.On the plea for an alternative alignment, the Centre had said “the alignment No.6, which is the present alignment of the Sethusamudram project, has been validly resorted to after a due consideration of all relevant factors, including ecological factors. Bhardwaj announced that the objectionable portions in the ASI affidavit would be withdrawn and a supplementary affidavit filed on Friday. The ASG said it would consider all points of view and take a final decision.

tumkur college girls for dating-14

He said his party was not opposed to the project itself but wanted its realignment to save the bridge. Why couldn’t they have Roman ones, to be pronounced better?

“I do not agree with that,” he said when pointed to allegations that the BJP had lost credibility over Hindu religious issues because it did not build a Ram temple while being in power. Rama, Lakshmana, Bharatha and Shatrughana are the sons of Dasaratha. The entire East Asia reverberates with the tales of Rama and enactment of the Ramayana including the Muslim-majority Malaysia and Indonesia and countries ruled by the Communists.

The suspension was approved by Tourism and Culture Minister Ambika Soni.

However, preliminary inquiry has shown that the said affidavit was vetted by the Ministry of Culture and Law.

BJP insists on apology from PM, Sonia on Ram Setu issue New Delhi, Sept.

14 (PTI): The BJP today stuck to its demand that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Congress chief Sonia Gandhi apologise for the controversial affidavit on Ram Setu, and described its withdrawal as an outcome of “Hindu outrage.” “The withdrawal is no abatement of the seriousness of the issue. Both the prime minister and the Congress chief owe an apology to the country,” BJP spokesman Prakash Javadekar told reporters.“The government is unequivocally committed to destroying the Ram Setu, which we will never allow,” he remarked.Asked why his party did not oppose the project when it was cleared during the NDA rule, he claimed there was no proposal at that stage that it would have to pass through the Ram Setu.A committee of experts is being set up to gather details regarding the Ram Setu, known as Adam’s Bridge, for students up to the class 12 level, officials said on Friday. The language of the affidavit and the way it addressed the Adam’s Bridge issue smacked of an utter disregard for Hindus.They said Uttarakhand would become the first state in the country to teach chapters on the bridge — which according to legend was built by Lord Ram’s ‘vanar sena’ — in the school curriculum. They hate calling it Ram Sethu and feel quite comfortable with Adam’s Bridge, a much later coinage. The way the whole issue is being dealt with by the government of India right from the beginning stinks of dishonesty and an aversion to Hindu sensitivities.The feasibility of alternative alignments would be considered in three months, Additional Solicitor-General Gopal Subramaniam told a Bench consisting of Chief Justice K. A mechanism would be set up to consider objections/suggestions from petitioners and others, and a final decision on the alignment would be taken in three months.